Unique Interpretation of Necessity and Freedom in the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd Based on the Rejection of the Opinions of His Contemporaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v5i3.301Ključne besede:
Freedom, Fate, Dependence, Morality, Faith, Fatalism, Greed, God, Moral Goodness, Determinism, TheologyPovzetek
The article delves into Ibn Rushd's perspectives on the notions of freedom and necessity, as a prominent figure within the Eastern Peripatetic movement. His stance is elucidated through his rejection of the prevailing notions held by his peers. Within the medieval philosophical landscape, the discourse surrounding freedom and necessity often revolved around reconciling religious and philosophical ideologies. The article particularly highlights discussions on fate and volition. In response to the controversy over whether people's actions are carried out by the necessity of fate or by their independent arbitrary actions, Ibn Rushd gives his arguments.Prenosi
Literatura
Adamson, P. (2016). Philosophy in the Islamic World: A history of philosophy without any gaps, Volume 3. Oxford University Press.
Arzt, D. E. (1995). Heroes or heretics: Religious dissidents under Islamic law. Wis. Int'l LJ, 14, 349.
Cordova, V. F. (2007). How it is: The native American philosophy of VF Cordova. University of Arizona Press.
Di Giovanni, M. (2018). Averroes, philosopher of Islam. Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays, 9-26.
Harrison, S. K. (2014). Waste Matters: Urban Margins in Contemporary Postcolonial Literature (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin--Madison).
Mensia, M. A. (2019). Dogmatics, Theology, and Philosophy in Averroes. Interpreting Averroes, 27-44.
Omar, A. (2015). A Comparative Account of Political Authority in the Political Thought of Ibn Rushd (12th c.) and Marsilius of Padua (14th c.). University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
Raaflaub, K. (2004). The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece: Revised and Updated Edition. University of Chicago Press.
Woerther, F. (2019). Averroes’ Goals in the Paraphrase (Middle Commentary) of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays, 218.
Ренан, Э. (2010). Аверроэс и аверроизм.
Рушд, И. (1973). Рассуждение, выносящее решение относительно связи между религией и философией. Сагадеев АВ Ибн Рушд. М, 371-376.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2024 International Journal Papier Public Review
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
